Categories
Archives
- July 2026
- June 2026
- May 2026
- April 2026
- March 2026
- February 2026
- January 2026
- December 2025
- November 2025
- October 2025
- September 2025
- July 2025
- June 2025
- May 2025
- April 2025
- March 2025
- February 2025
- January 2025
- December 2024
- November 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- 0
Thought For The Week: “Your present circumstances don’t determine where you can go; they merely determine where you start.” Nido Qubein
Career Counselors, Thought For The Day
Comments Off on Thought For The Week: “Your present circumstances don’t determine where you can go; they merely determine where you start.” Nido Qubein
Law Students from Small Nations Make a Big Difference
Yes, law students can make a difference — a big one as it turns out.
Last Sunday’s New York Times magazine was devoted to the issue of climate change. Included in the coverage was an article about law students, attending law schools in island nations, who had taken up the climate change cause after witnessing how climate change continued to ravage their homelands. They took their grievances to the highest court on earth and were successful.
In 2019, law students from Tonga and the Solomon Islands, among other island nations, organized to address a lasting solution to enforce international cooperation on climate change. The Paris Climate Accords had not proved effective, and the students wanted a result with the teeth of the rule of law. Their answer was to petition the United Nations General Assembly for recognition of a cause of action based on human rights and the responsibility of UN member nations to do no harm by ignoring the effects of climate change on their own citizens and those of neighboring countries. Four years later, in March 2023, the General Assembly unanimously found in their favor, and the next stop for the students was the International Court of Justice (ICJ) at The Hague in the Netherlands.
In December 2024, those students were among 96 countries and 11 international organizations addressing the ICJ with their grievances. In recognition of their years-long fight for the cause, the first speakers were the students, who, by that time, were full blown lawyers pursuing equally compelling causes in their home countries. Six months later, in July of 2025, the ICJ issued an advisory opinion that the full gamut of international law applies to climate change and that countries have a duty, founded in human rights, to prevent environmental harm caused by emitting greenhouse gases and can be held legally accountable for failure to exercise that duty.
It is an amazing and inspiring story, and I felt better about the world just reading it. Most of all, it confirmed my faith in young lawyers and their abilities to make differences that are needed across the globe. The just causes for making a difference are legion, and the work is rewarding. Whether that work is prosecuting felons, assuring access to the voting booths, fighting for the rights of field workers or countless other causes that need addressing, it is good work and it gives back by feeding the souls of those who labor in the trenches.
That “good work” may have special appeal for young lawyers who are not cut out for large law firm practice. The choice for good work also might appeal to those young lawyers who are not satisfied with making more money for clients who already have more than they can spend.
ASK YOURSELF how you can make a difference and whether you want to — a difference perhaps not as globally significant as battling climate change but certainly important to discrete constituencies. Think about it. Try on the possibility and see if it fits.
If it does, I hope that it will be as enriching for you as it was for my father, my husband, myself and our son and daughter for portions of our legal careers. Generally speaking, those were the most satisfying years of our practices and helped to develop who and what we became as lawyers.
The differences you can make will never leave you.
Career Counselors, Law School Educators, Law Students, Practice Advice, Pre-law, Young Lawyer
Comments Off on Law Students from Small Nations Make a Big Difference
Thought For The Week: “Hate, it has caused a lot of problems in the world, but has not solved one yet.” Maya Angelou
Career Counselors, Thought For The Day
Comments Off on Thought For The Week: “Hate, it has caused a lot of problems in the world, but has not solved one yet.” Maya Angelou
The Dangerous Quest For Perfection
Perfectionism, the plague for many law practitioners, is something I have written about before. My consistent bottom line has been that perfectionism for lawyers is dangerous to their well being. My mantra has been Do Not Sacrifice Good on the Altar of Perfect.
Having said that, I know that it is much more complicated than a slogan or a mantra. The practice of law is fraught with multiple critics: Clients, colleagues, supervising lawyers, and judges among them. They all want the perfect lawyer, and they all can be very hard on those they perceive as falling short of that standard.
A recent study from Krill Strategies, Ambition Profile and NALP (National Association For Law Placement), as reported on by Above the Law and commented on by Vivia Chen on her Ex-Careerist forum, makes the dangers of perfectionism more clear than ever before. Based on a survey of 764 lawyers, that study identifies the price of perfectionism as stress, depression, workaholism, resistance to feedback, and reduced engagement, motivation, and longevity. The underlying data demonstrates that among lawyers, who scored high on the perfectionist scale, 50.6% showed elevated depression compared to 7.1% in the low-perfectionism group. Perfectionist lawyers also tend to have shorter tenures at their firms: 5.3 years, compared to 8.4 years for low-perfectionists. And, unsurprisingly, women reported higher levels of perfectionism and stress.
In the NALP article reporting the survey results, the emphasis is on both the mental health challenges faced by perfectionist lawyers and the institutions that foster those challenges. The article includes recommendations for mitigating the negative effects of perfectionism on both the individual and institutional levels — without compromising work quality. The challenge in eradicating the dangers of perfectionism is for both the individual lawyers and the law organizations which employ them. Perspectives and behaviors will have to change to reduce the demand for perfect performance and protect practitioners.
For most people, the pursuit of perfection is unhealthy and dangerous. There always will be those among us who can easily meet that standard without harm, and we all will recognize them. For so many others, however, “excellent” and “very good” performance should be rewarded in ways that do not relegate that performance to secondary positions and create the expectations for more.
Being all that they CAN BE without experiencing harm is a much healthier goal for young lawyers, especially, and will lead to more genuine satisfaction in both professional and personal lives.
The Value of Civil Discourse and the Price We Pay Without It
Yesterday was a sobering reminder of what is so wrong in American society today. The murder of conservative operative Charlie Kirk because of his political beliefs runs so contrary to who and what we should strive to be as a nation. As we should know by now, this kind of violence has its beginning in uncivil discourse.
Today I share with you words I wrote almost five years ago and included in my most recent book, New Lawyer Launch: the Handbook for Young Lawyers (Full Court Press, 2022). Although these words are directed at young lawyers, they have a much broader application throughout our society.
“At one time, respect and decency and honorable behavior were givens in the law profession. This no longer is true today. A fever of disrespect and indecency has seeped into our society and institutions, and it is infecting the legal profession. The manifestations of this fever are name-calling, derision, intimidation, bullying, distortion of the truth, and a lack of caring about the welfare of others. Too many lawyers have abandoned their professional responsibilities and become part of a broader societal problem. Some call it “cancel culture” and some call it just plain wrong.”
“Civil discourse especially has declined in recent years in the law profession. Lawyers relish in disagreement and abusive and unprofessional language to describe colleagues, parties to disputes, opposing counsel, and others who do not agree with them, and willingness to compromise seems to be at an all-time low.”
“I have been writing about decency and its importance to the honorable practice of law for almost a decade. Never, however, has that subject seemed more important and relevant to me than it does today. My 2020 ABA Journal column “The Power of Decency in the Legal Profession” includes an expanded discussion of this endemic problem, and my earlier 2016 article in Corporate Counsel addressed the toxicity of the law profession that existed then and carries over in many legal settings today.”
Although these articles were written years ago, I believe that they have even greater application today. The views expressed there also are expressed eloquently in a Substack article today by Honorable Patrick J. Murphy which I also recommend to you. In that article, Mr. Murphy writes specifically about the assassination of Charlie Kirk and the imperative need to turn down the temperature of our dialogue and increase our tolerance for opposing beliefs.
Civility should be the goal for all lawyers and the broader population as well. It is important that we demonstrate respect, dignity, and civil discourse in our disagreements and debates because the public is watching us, judging us, and emulating our behavior and conduct.
The failure to rise to this goal is a large part of what has lead to the frightening and toxic state of our society today, as exemplified by the events of yesterday and the far too many other senseless acts of violence in recent years. We must put a stop to the underlying erosion of civil discourse while we still can.
I urge all Americans to prioritize accomplishing this goal.
PURCHASE ONLINE AT:

PURCHASE ONLINE AT:
PURCHASE ONLINE AT:
PURCHASE ONLINE AT:
PURCHASE ONLINE AT:
ABOUT THE
AUTHOR







