“Find joy in everything you choose to do. Every job, relationship, home… it’s your responsibility to love it, or change it.”
Chuck Palahniuk
“Find joy in everything you choose to do. Every job, relationship, home… it’s your responsibility to love it, or change it.”
Chuck Palahniuk
Law 360 has confirmed that the hiring stats for women lawyers have not improved since they were measured at this time last year, and the cause seems to be clear: Unconscious bias against women in law, according to industry leaders from in-house counsel to BigLaw leaders. Of course, this comes as no surprise to me, based on my own research, and it is a subject that I address in my new book, Best Friends at the Bar: Top-Down Leadership for Women Lawyers, to be released in the summer of 2015.
The Law 360 article quotes one BigLaw chairman as saying, “The best way for firms to address this is to be aware of it. Because it is unconscious bias, we effect change when we discuss it and make people aware of it.” Makes sense to me, but getting the conversation going and having the male leadership of law firms listen and admit to biased attitudes will take more than a nice quote.
The data, however, is clear, and law firms need to take action. Law 360’s 2015 Glass Ceiling Report provides survey results from 308 firms and displays a bleak picture for women in law. The percentages of total attorneys who are female and the percentages of law firm partners who are female are both up only slightly from last year’s report. Although law school graduating classes are approximately 50 percent female today, the report projects that it will be 2072 before women make up 50 percent of U.S. law firm partners.
That is a shocking revelation. Law firm leaders have been making assumptions about the future of individual women lawyers based on general preconceived notions since the profession first included women more than 4o years ago, and those assumptions have come to be self-fulfilling prophecies. If a young women is told that she is not a good law firm investment because she most likely will leave to have a baby, she then is most likely to leave and have a baby. If no one at the office has confidence in her professional future, how can we expect her to? Add disparate mentoring and networking opportunities for women versus men to those unfortunate assumptions, throw in a little bias in the performance review process, and you have the makings of unconscious bias that can affect a woman lawyer’s career for years into her future — if she can salvage a career at all.
Admitting unconscious bias is not shameful. We all have unconscious biases of one kind or another. The shame is not doing something about it. It cannot be assumed that all women lawyers want to avoid long hours and frequent travel. Some do, and some don’t. Even for women who become mothers, it is a lifestyle choice. We should not be doing the thinking and choosing for them with our own preconceived notions. We need to treat them like individuals and have conversations with them about how to best manage their careers and their professional aspirations.
Metrics and using those metrics to change outcomes is the key. One law firm, Reed Smith, is doing just that, and you will read about the PipelineRS program in my new book. There has been a significant increase in the percentage of new partners who are women at Reed Smith based on this methodology and followup training, and the program is a model for other firms to follow.
Who benefits from this exercise in rooting out unconscious bias? Everyone benefits. The women benefit from fair workplace practices, and the law firms benefit from retaining talent and demonstrating the diversity that in-house law departments are demanding more and more from outside counsel. And the profession benefits from best practices grounded in retaining dedicated and talented lawyers.
It is a win-win. So let’s just do it!
Do you suffer from unconscious bias? Take the test and find out: http://www.criticalmeasures.net/articles-biased.html.
“My coach said I ran like a girl. I said if he could run a little faster he could too.”
Mia Hamm
“We cannot seek achievement for ourselves and forget about progress and prosperity for our community…Our ambitions must be broad enough to include the aspirations and needs of others, for their sakes and for our own.”
Cesar Chavez
I have written on this subject before, and I return to it because I am hearing more and more chatter about it lately. Much of the conversation is about advancing women to corporate boards. In the last few years, countries all over the globe have passed laws mandating quotas for female participation on corporate boards. Norway led the pack, imposing a quota of 40%, followed by France, Ireland and Spain. The Netherlands and Malaysia chose quotas of 30%, and Australia, Britain and Sweden are seriously considering quotas and threatening legislation unless companies voluntarily comply with increasing the number of corporate board seats for women.
Although the trend started with businesses, it also is an issue in law firms. However, I am not a fan of quotas for advancement of women in law firms, and nothing I have read has changed my mind from the time that I first addressed the subject in 2012. Here’s what I said then and what I continue to believe:
It seems to me that women lawyers want to get where they need to go by being qualified and being recognized for their merit. History shows us that quotas cause more resentment than respect, and such a result would be regrettable. It does not matter how high you rise if you are not taken seriously when you get there.
I think imposing quotas for the advancement of women, especially in the law profession, is a slippery slope, and I pay close attention to comments suggesting that advancing women to partnership and management positions in law firms before they are experienced enough for the responsibilities of those positions will lead to perceptions that the women are mere “window dressing in rooms full of experienced and powerful men” and the suggestion that advancing women in this shortcut manner will not result in a long term solution.
I also fear that quotas will carry the implication that women lawyers cannot succeed on their own. We can, and we will. However, that does not mean that we do not need help, but I am not convinced that quotas is the help we need. It seems that some others agree.
A recent Lawyers Weekly article reported on the situation in Australia where a majority of managing partners believe the best way to increase the number of women in leadership roles is to focus on retaining female lawyers, not through imposition of quotas. In the underlying survey, 34 managing partners at major Australian firms were asked how firms could achieve a higher percentage of women in partner roles.
Seventy percent of responding law firm managing partners suggested the best option for firms was to “ensure policies below partner level retain the best female talent.” Only 6.7 percent of those responding favored quotas, 10 percent were in favor of unconscious bias training for law firm partners, and a little over 13 percent suggested aspirational targets rather than strict quotas.
The majority of respondents emphasized the need to engage with female partners and associates to develop programs and support structures that address the issues that cause female lawyers to either leave firms prior to promotion to partnership or block the conventional pathways to partnership. Another focus among the respondents was on reintegration of women after maternity leave as an important consideration in significantly changing the percentage of female partners.
What do you think? Are quotas the answer to advancing women in the profession of law? Let me hear from you.
“When people keep telling you, you can’t do a thing, you kind of like to try.”
Senator Margaret Chase (1897-1995)
Today is Equal Pay Day, national recognition of the mandate for women to catch up to what men earn for equal work. It is an important day for women and for their families, so help spread the word. We all need to keep the pressure on our lawmakers to put teeth in the laws that will create the equality that we need.
As a woman, mother, professional and small business owner, I am passionate about ensuring everyone is paid fairly for his or her work. Women’s issues are everyone’s issues; they impact our daily lives. They also are economic issues and quality of life issues.
It seems simple, right? When a woman does the same job as a man, she deserves the same pay. But, nothing is simple these days
Women still are not paid the same when they do the same work as men in many jobs across America, and the situation with women lawyers is no exception. Yes, we have come a long way in the law profession, but there still are disparities that need to be addressed. And the issues do not stop with the equal pay checks. Other disparities lend to unequal pay.
For instance, if women lawyers do not have equal access to valued firm clients and quality work, they will be negatively impacted in how they are able to advance in the firm and get to higher pay levels. If women lawyers are assigned to meaningless committees that have nothing to do with hard-core law practice and business strategies, they are less likely to be able to demonstrate value to the firm and be paid for that value. It is all related.
A disparity in pay for equal work hurts all women — single women, mothers and the families of those women, especially those families that are being supported by women as single parents. Righting this wrong is long overdue. President Kennedy signed the Equal Pay Act into law in 1963, at a time when women were earning an average of 59 cents on the dollar compared to men. More than fifty years later, women on average only earn 79 cents on the dollar compared to men. Women earn a median income in the range of $10,784 to $36,931 less than men with similar experience, and this costs women and their families hundreds of thousands of dollars over a lifetime.
The gender wage gap makes families less secure, slows economic growth, and is critical to middle-class security. The pay gap is even greater for women of color, with African American women earning approximately 64 cents and Latina women only earning approximately 56 cents for every dollar earned by a non-Hispanic white man.
I support equal pay for women. Equal pay for equal work, that is. It is an important distinction, and one that you need to remember. If you expect to get paid equally for doing less work or even having the opportunity to work flexible hours, you may be setting the cause for equal pay back rather than advancing it. Make sure that it is equal pay for equal work.
For more on equal pay and equal opportunities for women in the law, see the National Association of Women Lawyers (NAWL) web site to access the most recent NAWL Annual Survey on Retention and Promotion of Women in Law Firms. The NAWL Survey is an important resource to quantify the disparity in pay, promotion and advancement of women in the legal profession.
“Beauty is not in the face; beauty is a light in the heart.”
Khalil Gibran
PURCHASE ONLINE AT:
PURCHASE ONLINE AT:
PURCHASE ONLINE AT:
PURCHASE ONLINE AT:
PURCHASE ONLINE AT: